Movie discovery

Explore stories across every screen

वृत्तचित्रवर्ष2015अवधि1hIMDb6.4

Is Amanda Knox Guilty?

वृत्तचित्रअपराध

When the 21-year-old Amanda Knox from Seattle takes the stand next week, she will have the biggest audience of her life. The whole world will be watching.

अभी देखें

ट्रेलर

कलाकार

Tina Daheley

Self - Narrator

DB

David Balding

Self - DNA Statistician

VB

Valter Biscotti

Self - Rudy Guede's Lawyer

GB

Giulia Bongiorno

Self - Raffaele Sollecito's Lawyer

AB

Anne Bremner

Self - Friends of Amanda Knox Campaign

MC

Manuela Comodi

Self - Prosecutor

GC

Giancarlo Costagliola

Self - Prosecutor

SG

Sarah Gino

Self - Knox Defence Forensic Biologist

LK

Lyle Kercher

Self - Meredith's Brother

SK

Stephanie Kercher

Self - Meredith's Sister

Amanda Knox

Self

CK

Curt Knox

Self - Amanda's Father

Patrick Lumumba

Self - Bar Owner

FM

Francesco Maresca

Self - Kercher Family Lawyer

GM

Giuliano Mignini

Self - Prosecutor

FS

Francesco Sollecito

Self

RS

Raffaele Sollecito

Self

PS

Patrizia Stefanoni

Self - Police Forensic Biologist

आपको ये भी पसंद आ सकते हैं

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.4

Is Amanda Knox Guilty?

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.8

Abducted in Plain Sight

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.9

Amanda Knox

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.4

Dream/Killer

वृत्तचित्र★ 5.6

Millionaire Murders

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.8

Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.2

Heaven's Gate

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.1

Murder Has Two Faces

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.9

Murdaugh Murders: Deadly Dynasty

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.3

The Clown and the Candyman

ड्रामा★ 7.5

All Her Fault

ड्रामा★ 6.7

Good American Family

Biography★ 6.7

The Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox

Biography★ 7.2

Murdaugh: Death in the Family

अपराध★ 7.0

The Killer Truth

अपराध★ 6.7

Les disparues de la gare

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.9

The Golden State Killer: It's Not Over

वृत्तचित्र★ 8.3

Creedon's Atlas of Ireland

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.6

The Man with 1000 Kids

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.5

I, Sniper

वृत्तचित्र★ 8.4

24 Hours in Police Custody

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.2

World's Most Evil Killers

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.1

The Ripper

टिप्पणियाँ

6 टिप्पणियाँ

Omi__ ❤️Jul 31, 2024

Is Amanda Knox Guilty?

LarrywheelsMay 29, 2023

source: Is Amanda Knox Guilty?

💥May 23, 2023

This so called documentary actually is not deserving of this predicate. The director/author Andrea Vogt, a low quality tabloid-journalist, whose career is based almost exclusively on her personal involvement in this case and the media witch hunt for Amanda Knox, is not only intentionally misrepresenting the events of the case but is not reporting the facts but subjectively arguing following her own agenda. The main part of the documentary uses frankly non-existing evidence, purposely ignoring the results of all independent experts who reported to the courts in their entirety and also, in the same breath, purposely excludes the vast majority of exonerating evidence. Journalistic standards are broken brutally and constantly and the facts of the case are distorted to the extent that they become absolutely unrecognizable. Vogt tries to prove a not-fact-based version of the crime which leaves room or at least creates enough artificial doubt for Vogt's theory of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito being the killers after all. To get there she's not even afraid of using bogus science, wrongful statements that are never corrected, fake information and even manipulating CSI video material. Her use of preexisting material of Knox and Sollecito against them is absolutely abusive and inflammatory. All in all a pack of vicious lies created to misinform the public and cement the directors own reputation in opposition to two court verdicts that acquitted Knox and Sollecito because 'they did not commit the crime´.

Arf YldrımMay 19, 2023

HadeelApr 13, 2023

source: Is Amanda Knox Guilty?

Theophilus MensahApr 13, 2023

This so called documentary actually is not deserving of this predicate. The director/author Andrea Vogt, a low quality tabloid-journalist, whose career is based almost exclusively on her personal involvement in this case and the media witch hunt for Amanda Knox, is not only intentionally misrepresenting the events of the case but is not reporting the facts but subjectively arguing following her own agenda. The main part of the documentary uses frankly non-existing evidence, purposely ignoring the results of all independent experts who reported to the courts in their entirety and also, in the same breath, purposely excludes the vast majority of exonerating evidence. Journalistic standards are broken brutally and constantly and the facts of the case are distorted to the extent that they become absolutely unrecognizable. Vogt tries to prove a not-fact-based version of the crime which leaves room or at least creates enough artificial doubt for Vogt's theory of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito being the killers after all. To get there she's not even afraid of using bogus science, wrongful statements that are never corrected, fake information and even manipulating CSI video material. Her use of preexisting material of Knox and Sollecito against them is absolutely abusive and inflammatory. All in all a pack of vicious lies created to misinform the public and cement the directors own reputation in opposition to two court verdicts that acquitted Knox and Sollecito because 'they did not commit the crime´.

Featured Picks

और entertainment चाहिए? हमारे recommended gaming hub और short-drama destination को explore करें।

Instant Games

Gamixo

Puzzles, cards, sports और quick challenges वाले casual browser games कुछ ही सेकंड में खेलें।

Short Drama

VSKIT Drama

Trending mini-series, romance stories और नए short dramas को fast daily updates के साथ देखें।