Movie discovery

Explore stories across every screen

جريمةالسنة2006المدة1h 50mIMDb7.1

قالب

جريمةدراماأُحجِيَّة

تدور أحداث الفيلم حول شخص وحيد في سن المراهقة يدفعه الطريق إلى العالم الآخر من المدرسة العليا للتحقيق في جريمة اختفاء صديقته السابقة، وما شابهها من غموض.

شاهد الآن

الإعلان الترويجي

طاقم العمل

Rian Johnson

Director

Joseph Gordon-Levitt

Brendan

Lukas Haas

The Pin

Emilie de Ravin

Emily

Nora Zehetner

Laura

Noah Fleiss

Tugger

Matt O'Leary

The Brain

Noah Segan

Dode

Richard Roundtree

Assistant V.P. Trueman

Meagan Good

Kara

Brian White

Brad Bramish

Jonathan Cauff

Biff

Reedy Gibbs

Pin's Mom

Lucas Babin

Big Stoner

TB

Tracy Bitterolf

Straggler

Ari Welkom

Tangles

Cody Lightning

The Lug

MH

McJoel Hamilton

The Pin's Driver

Lauren Johnson

Woman Sweeping Backstage

Rian Johnson

Writer

قد يعجبك أيضًا

جريمة★ 4.0

الموت على الحدود

جريمة★ 4.4

Out of the Blue

جريمة★ 5.7

Forgiveness

جريمة★ 5.5

Perfect Plan

Two Weeks

فيلم وثائقي★ 5.5

Inside Dubai: Playground of the Rich

فيلم وثائقي★ 5.3

Inside Hotel Chocolat

جريمة★ 8.1

كيف تفلت بجريمة قتل

جريمة★ 6.5

ريفرديل

جريمة★ 7.8

محامي اللينكولن

جريمة★ 8.3

أرض الوطن

جريمة★ 6.9

One Of Us Is Lying

جريمة★ 6.6

دخان

جريمة★ 8.6

صائد العقول

جريمة★ 9.0

دكستر: القيامة

جريمة★ 6.4

حالة من الجنون

جريمة★ 6.5

الزوجان المثاليان

جريمة★ 6.9

هايتاون

جريمة★ 8.1

الرافعة المالية: الفداء

جريمة★ 6.8

جمعية حديقة جروس بوينت

جريمة★ 6.8

Pretty Little Liars: The Perfectionists

جريمة★ 6.0

سكاربيتا

جريمة★ 7.4

The Undoing

جريمة★ 6.5

طبيب العصابة

التعليقات

10 تعليق

WarrenSep 5, 2025

GloriaSep 5, 2025

SWAT々ROSUNツSep 5, 2025

France NancySep 5, 2025

mootsamDec 24, 2024

I tried stretching to watch this movie with an open mind, some 'arty' movies take a while to build toward a payoff. But the clues that were shown to me in this mystery pointed toward no payoff whatsoever, so I didn't finish it. It sucks. I hadn't heard much about the movie, so I was wondering 'is this an un-funny farce?'. I guess it isn't a farce, it's supposed to be a noir. It's a disaster. Unbelievably pretentious dialog, and 'hipster' speech. I thought that kind of talk died in the 1970s. The mindset of the teenagers, trying to put forth this 'world' they supposedly live in, in a high school setting just doesn't fly. It's like a very, very bad high school play, painfully aware that these are just kids trying to be something they're not, never have been, and never will be. Even high school at it's worst was never that bad. Seriously, this film gives you respect for the portrayal of high school in Beverly Hills 90201, which at least had *some* believability to it, even if you didn't like it. In most films, with good or bad acting, I'm generally not aware that they are acting. Not the case here. Pretension takes an even worse form in the wardrobes. I didn't check the spoilers box, and I'm new at this, so I'll be vague. All I'll say, is that I stopped the film and gave up at the introduction of a character, who was dressed too stupid for me to watch. (those reading this who have seen the film probably can guess who I'm talking about, lets just say he made the film a CAPEr) You've got to have some respect for the audience This director, clearly doesn't. As for those who say that people who didn't like the film 'didn't get it', ie, modern film noir, compare this to 'Match Point', made the same year. This film is just a very tired rip-off of whatever it was trying to reference. The saddest thing is, since the film had popularity, there may be outsider kids who try to model some of this style in their own high schools, and it's going to take them down another notch they cant afford

Sidoine EttienDec 24, 2024

Saw this at the Mill Valley Film Festival. It's essentially a film noir set in present-day San Clemente High School, reminiscent of "The Big Sleep," but with drug-dealing added to the mix of double-crossing. The characters may be teenagers, but the dialog channels Chandler and Hammett, and my only real complaint with the film is that Joseph Gordon-Leavitt (in an otherwise wonderful performance) sometimes mumbles; this is dialog you don't want to miss. Lukas Haas is wonderfully eccentric in what is essentially the Sidney Greenstreet role, Noah Fleiss as the dumb thug, and Nora Zehetner even LOOKs like Mary Astor. As with all the great American noir films, there are many sardonic laughs inserted into the dark story.

MayorkunDec 24, 2024

This is an EXCELLENT and delightfully surprising movie. Its style is refreshing, its dialoque fascinating, the performances powerful, and the story is both energetic and fun. I just caught this movie at the sundance film festival and can't help hoping that A LOT more people get to see it. The amazing attention to detail by Rian Johnson (the writer/director) and the incredible performances by Haas, Zehetner, and especially Joseph Gordon-Levitt marks this very commendable film. I remember sitting in the theater before the film started, completely disappointed by the last two films I had seen the night before. I truly wasn't expecting to be wowed or even awake, but from the very first scene I had to keep "my specs peeled". We just don't get to experience the feel of this movie anymore. I highly recommend it once it's out.

Sandra GyasiDec 24, 2024

"Brick" is completely lacking in any sort of believability or even plausibility, and even if you pretend that it takes place in an alternate universe where everybody speaks 'stylized' as opposed to English, the dialogue sounds silly and ridiculous spoken by typical high school kids. I can buy this sort of stylized dialogue if spoken by gangsters and private detectives, but high school kids? Even in a fantasy universe the characters have to be believable but in this case the characters, their motives, their lives (lifestyles, more like), their way of speaking, and their mannerisms completely lack believability or plausibility and while I SHOULD be invested in the outcome of the film's events I simply cannot be because I'm reminded over and over again that these characters aren't plausible. "Brick" is original in the sense that there are no other stylized neo-noir films set in high school, but it lacks originality in all other areas. Rian Johnson's (who is clearly, based on this film, a very talented director) direction is almost too inspired by classic noir for the film to work in its own right. It's certainly pretty to look at, and quite well-paced, but it's far too concerned with being an homage to bother with feeling genuine. The same could be said of the plot, characters, and dialogue, which are all so 'inspired' by Raymond Chandler and countless other sources that they seem far more interested in packing in homage after allusion after homage after allusion than telling a story. The story itself is mildly interesting, and some of the plot twists and turns got an 'ooh' out of me, but the whole thing feels completely phony and soulless. The sort of thing that would have been fun as a 10-minute short for film class, but is incredibly frustrating as a feature. The acting is good from everybody involved, and Rian Johnson's shot composition is excellent, as well as the cinematography by Steve Yedlin and the score by Nathan Johnson. The script is outrageously silly and over-the-top, but at least the film is nice to look at. A noir story in a high school setting is a reasonable idea, and this film could have been quite good, but instead of working in all the staples of a noir Johnson instead goes all out and makes something so frustratingly derivative and intensely stylized that it doesn't for a second feel plausible. No, I'm not looking for realism here, just some form of plausibility and believability. Do you question the world of "Star Wars"? Do you question the persistently stylized dialogue in classic noir films? No, of course you don't, because they feel genuine. Above everything else, "Brick" is completely phony. Not a second feels real, and by the tenth time Joseph Gordon-Levitt attempted a Marlowe routine I was already shaking my head in disbelief at the waste of talent this film was. It's so phony and so gimmicky that it becomes genuinely hard to sit through. 4/10

EhllarpearlDec 24, 2024

The geography of film noir is usually a neighborhood, a city, a region ... BRICK transposes this geography onto a high school with surprisingly successful results. Watching it brought to mind not only the black & white films of the 40s and 50s, but glimmers of Gus van Sant, David Lynch and River's Edge. What gives BRICK its filmic authenticity (much different from realism) is its language -- the language of Chandler and Hammett, but re-imagined from the lips of contemporary teens. The effect is staggering. BRICK essentially re-creates a world we thought we knew. Suddenly there are forces at work that we recognize because we knew they were there. But to see them in this noir glow is to give them an exciting new life ... "to see them again for the first time." There are plot twists and surprises aplenty here, although familiar once you realize the inspirations for the film. But familiarity is more than compensated by a superb cast and (not generally noted in these comments) excellent music. Contemporizing the soundtrack keeps us on our toes and makes a significant contribution to the tension of BRICK. A terrific debut!

Siku NkhomaDec 24, 2024

When I heard that Brick was a "film noir set in a high school", that sounded good. Had I known what it really was, I'd have saved my time and money. Brick tries so hard to be a film noir of the 30s that it puts the slang of the 30s into the mouths of current-day high school kids. This is fun for a few moments, but quickly becomes silly. High school kids don't call each other "shamus" or go "on the lam", etc. If it was set in a 30s high school, that could work. But having period dialog in a current-day movie is just strange, not interesting. Then there's the length. Film noir tended to be short: 90 minutes... not 2 hours! If you're trying to copy film noir, how about copying the length so that it doesn't become boring? This film could easily have been cut down by at least 30 minutes and wouldn't have dragged so much. The production values were also spotty. In an overly-long final scene, the sky is so bright that the character is washed out completely. But the real problem is that this film doesn't know what it really wants to be. Is it taking place in a high school or not? The characters don't interact at all like high school kids. They interact as if they're playing a grade-b film noir and are adult cops and robbers. The high school setting is a backdrop that isn't really used at all. None of the activities or dynamics of a high school appear anywhere in the film. Instead, we get scenes where the Vice Principal (whom they call the VP) calls the protagonist into his office as if he were a police commander talking to a renegade officer. It just doesn't work. The gimmick gets old quickly, and we're left with nothing else. This would have made a good novelty short, but it fails as feature film.

اختيارات مميزة

هل تريد المزيد من الترفيه؟ استكشف منصة الألعاب المقترحة ووجهة الدراما القصيرة التي نوصي بها.

ألعاب فورية

Gamixo

العب ألعاب المتصفح الخفيفة مثل الألغاز والورق والرياضة والتحديات السريعة خلال ثوانٍ.

دراما قصيرة

VSKIT Drama

شاهد المسلسلات القصيرة الرائجة وقصص الرومانسية والدراما الجديدة مع تحديثات يومية سريعة.