Movie discovery

Explore stories across every screen

वृत्तचित्रवर्ष2006अवधि1h 36mIMDb7.4

एक असुविधाजनक सच

वृत्तचित्र

यह एक चेतावनी सूचना है, जो यह संदेश देने वाले मिथकों और गलत अवधारणाओं को रोकती है कि वैश्विक तापक्रम वृद्धि एक वास्तविक और मौजूदा खतरा है. एक असुविधाजनक सत्य गोर के इस ठोस तर्क को और स्पष्ट करता है कि पृथ्वी को बचाने के लिए हमें अ...

अभी देखें

ट्रेलर

कलाकार

Davis Guggenheim

Director

Al Gore

Self

Billy West

Self

George Bush

Self

George W. Bush

Self

Ronald Reagan

Self

Al Gore

Writer

आपको ये भी पसंद आ सकते हैं

वृत्तचित्र★ 3.9

Addicted to Sexting

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.9

Rat Film

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.4

Stormy

वृत्तचित्र★ 5.4

Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World

कॉमेडी★ 5.0

Bir Yeralti Sitcom'u

वृत्तचित्र★ 5.2

Sex Next Door

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.3

How to Get Rich

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.4

Magic City: An American Fantasy

वृत्तचित्र★ 9.2

Our Planet

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.3

Marines

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.1

The Principles of Pleasure

वृत्तचित्र★ 8.0

The Mind, Explained

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.4

The Walking Dead: Origins

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.1

Trust Me: The False Prophet

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.4

Seduced to Slay

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.8

Michael Jackson: The Verdict

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.0

Anunnaki: Ancient Secrets Revealed

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.9

Secrets of Playboy

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.2

Nelly & Ashanti: We Belong Together

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.3

The UnXplained

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.9

Should I Marry a Murderer?

वृत्तचित्र★ 7.2

Earthstorm

वृत्तचित्र★ 6.5

Bad Influence: The Dark Side of Kidfluencing

टिप्पणियाँ

10 टिप्पणियाँ

abdollah bellaMay 29, 2023

source: An Inconvenient Truth

KokaNov 22, 2022

This movie is definitely bigger than Al Gore ! As an outsider, I see some political overtones here and there but on the whole, it is a compelling argument in favor of how we could potentially alter the 'global climatic cycles' ! The analogies he draws, his call for action and most importantly his passion for environment come across clearly. Even more so, we understand Al Gore himself as a son, a brother, a father and most of all a human being who cannot just sit there and watch his neighbor's house burn ! As a movie, I would rate it as 'worth a watch' and 'worth telling your movie-buffet buddies about'. Despite all this, the absence of something caught my eye. Al Gore explains all his charts and data very well... .. but when he shows this particular chart that has the temperature-CO2 levels projected over the last 600,000 year time line, he only shows how high the 'current CO2 levels' are compared to any other time in this span! At this point, I was really curious to know how the temperature changed with respect to it in recent years and if it still adhered to the previous 'cyclical limits' but he does not display that data or even attempt to project future estimates! May be a convenient omission? I have not seen this data anywhere else but if one of you come across that last piece of information missing in the movie, can you please post it here?

Raashi KhannaNov 22, 2022

In spite of the fact that Global Warming is supposed to be a scientific theory, most of its defenders say that you have to "believe" in it. I'm sorry, but science is not something to be believed in. There is science and there is faith. both are fine by me, but you should not have to "believe" in a scientific theory. By its very name, a scientific theory is something that needs to be evaluated from every angle, contested and tested yet again. That's the essence of science, and it is disheartening to see science being hijacked by people that want you to "believe". I was hoping this film would help foster an intelligent discussion but all it has fostered is a wave of people saying that you have to "believe", and that is the worst thing that has happened to science in a long time.

⛓🖤مشاعر مبعثره🖤⛓Nov 22, 2022

A hint I think may be gathered by the various comments on this thread. I was quite amazed at the number of people who liked this film who want to make it "mandatory" or "compulsory". I think this gives us a little bit of insight into the reason this film and the issue underlying it is so polarizing. The Global Warming issue appeals a lot to people who want to force others to "do right". It appeals particularly to more "liberal" leaning people because it doesn't have to do with bedroom morality which is what usually gets conservatives who want to force you to "be good" going. And that's the problem with the film. Al Gore is a politician. And a very successful one at that. He just can't help himself from appealing to those people who want to force others to do as they would. The political appeal is just too great. And there we are left with a scientific issue that may be of huge importance, reduced to a political issue appealing to those in the body politic with a predilection to force other to "do right". Another interesting question is how did the Environmental movement get hijacked by such people?

SamcheNov 22, 2022

Something that really does not go down right with Al Gore (and his supporters)'s theory is the whole thing about "concensus". If there were such a consensus, why is it that the "believers" in the almighty global warming feel the irrepressible need to try and bully anyone who questions them. Why is it that anyone who does not toe the line on global warming is met with smug accusations of being either stupid or on the payroll of the oil companies (apparently being a professional global warming researcher does not mean you're on anyone's payroll in that wondrous world...) Why is there such a need to tell everyone how the whole question is settled, when it is the very nature of science to honestly question assumptions? For some ideas on the answer to those questions, read Prey by the well-know oil-stooge Michael Crichton... oh wait, he is rich and not on the payroll of the oil companies. He just took a huge career risk in not toeing the line of the Greens and other Kyoto worshippers and told the truth as he researched it. By the way did you know that abiding to the Kyoto protocol would result in almost no lowering of temperatures, according to its own backers? Just a few questions that Al Gore made sure to stay away from lest he not get every penny of the environmental lobby in case he decides to run again. So who's a stooge..?

DivyaNov 22, 2022

Don't drink the cool-aid. This is an opinion piece disguised as a documentary. And to title it as a "truth" is just plain crap. The debate over global warming is far from over, and will only be over when the eco-zombies start acknowledging the mountain of evidence contrary to their beloved theory. Just Google "Global Warming" and "Hoax" or "Junk Science" and you will find a river of information refuting nearly every link in the chain of logic that Gore sites. The reason it is so important for people to educate themselves is the disastrous economic impact that global warming prevention measures would have. Wake up people. Anyone with a computer, a little time, and some common sense can find many many reasons why this theory is not even close to credible. Don't just read articles that support your present opinions, read everything you can find. There is no in-depth analysis to make, really. There is simply too many alternate possibilities and counter-evidence for the theory to have even the most basic level of scientific credibility. It is so uncredible, in fact, that it may be the single biggest hoax in the course of human existence. It's time for people to start speaking out against this kind of propaganda, and it's time for people to admit to themselves and others that you can be a both a conservationist AND recognize the glaring conclusion that global warming hysteria is a big lie.

melinachettri❣Nov 22, 2022

Let's be honest shall we? Al Gore no more TRULY cares about the environment than most folks care about contacting foot fungus. It's a hook! Make no mistake, Al Gore is a POLITICIAN! Three years ago he was busted/ticketed in his home state doing 70 mph in a 55 mph zone driving NOT a hybrid, a Yugo, or even a Geo Metro but a LINCOLN (go google it if you like)! Or how about the fact that Mr. Gore & his Hollywood buddies continue to use private fuel-guzzling jets to attend the premiers of "An Inconvenient Truth." Not to mention his house in Tennessee yearly uses as much power as 20 average homes do. So much for conservation huh, Al? Anyway, it takes a mere minute to subjectively look at "An Inconvenient Truth" & discover the main fundamental flaw. While the film parades out many seemingly impressive scientists to tell the audience the EFFECTS of supposed "global Warming" there is not one scientist to tell us with ANY degree of certainty the supposed CAUSE of it. For example: I can take a hundred folks out to a parking lot & they can point out an automobile which is not running right. BUT can they tell you with any degree of certainty WHY? Generally not! A second flaw, just how accurate were the weather instruments 100 years ago (the toilet wasn't even invented yet)? What did they have, a June bug in a match box? Hell, even 50-60 years ago? Therefore, how do we know with ANY degree of confidence that the planet is "getting warmer" when the records of yesteryear are highly questionable at best? Or that man is THE sole cause of it? The answer is we don't & Science is NEVER a consensus. Forty years ago, Newsweek Magazine did a cover proclaiming a "New Ice Age". The real truth is that any 6th grade science teacher well versed in Earth Science will tell you that Volcanic Eruptions, Solar Activity & El Ninos have more to do with our eradicate changes in climate conditions than supposed "Global Warming." Finally, what Al Gore fails to adequately address is; even IF America decides to follow the global gospel according to Al & implement everything he recommends, how are we going to get the rest of the world to follow suit when we can't even get them to agree on something so obvious as terrorism? Answer: It's wishful thinking, Mr. Gore & you being a former VP of the USA know it! If the folks who produced "An Inconvenient Truth" were really honest, they would have titled their film "Al Gore Wants Attention." But what I'd really like is for someone to ask the former VP this; why were two of the planet's biggest polluters (AKA China & India) EXEMPT from abiding by the Kyoto Accords? Finally, in the winters of 2009-2011 with 49 out of 50 states experiencing record cold temperatures & Las Vegas getting 6 inches of snow, how is that "Global warming?". Now there is the real "Inconvenient Truth" for Mr. Gore & company. Well that & the fact, that it's now public knowledge that the scientists proclaiming global warming were caught red handed suppressing contradictory data & fudging the numbers. Time to find a new gig, Al!

Michelle ErkanaNov 22, 2022

Something very strange happens when you talk about Global Warming: science goes out the window and "belief" and "consensus" becomes the topic of discussion. It's because of that fact that I give a failing mark to Al Gore's documentary. Instead of promoting intelligent discussion, he kept the debate at the level of "belief" and "consensus". Of course, when you're trying to sell the world into spending trillions of dollars to "stop Global Warming" you may thing it's a problem to tell the scientific truth: we don't know how much of the current warming was caused by humans. Maybe none of it, maybe some of it, or maybe it has over-ceded the next Ice Age and we got really lucky not to have boiled the planet. But the fact remains that we don't know. so we're asked to "believe" in the "consensus". Never mind that any scientist that strays from the "consensus" is ostracized. Never mind that scientific inquiry is about straying from the consensus. Einstein didn't "believe" in the consensus, neither did Copernicus or Galileo. So why so much scorn placed on those very researchers who would advance the field by asking the tough questions? If Global Warming is so incontrovertible, surely a few people testing that theory can't be so threatening. What is going on here? That's the movie I was hoping Al Gore would have made. Istead, he chose to shore up his support with the true "believers" of the "consensus". Sad, really.

YoofiandJaneNov 22, 2022

It does touch a few interesting points.. But! - It fails to show evidence of all the 'exclusive' studies shown. Who are the 'friends' and 'small groups of scientists' that gathered this data? - What's up with all the Al Gore biography going on there? Like how he liked playing with the cows on the ranch or that his kid got hit by a car.. too bad but.. what does that have to do with the ozone layer? I've seen MUCH better stuff, in much less time, on Discovery Channel.. I really don't understand why this has such a high score on IMDb. Unless you've been living under a rock, this 'documentary' shouldn't be any news to you... all this is old news... And all Al Gore is trying to do is get some popularity points. P.S. i'm not American so don't even try saying that i'm a bush fan :p

Jojo KontaNov 22, 2022

I thought that this was on the whole a good film - I can imagine it being an EXCELLENT film for teachers to show to a class to explain global warming, actually. It explains the facts very well, explains away the objections that people have been hearing about from the media, and is also pretty funny at times. The film basically consists of a tour of Al Gore's climate change speeches around the world. It is, in essence, one long speech in various cities around the world (Al Gore says that he's given this presentation thousands of times), inter-cut with some various other footage. The film starts off with a few diagrams that many of you will probably have seen already, as well as a rather famous Futurama clip. In fact, if you're well-versed in your science, you'll probably already know much of what Al Gore talks about (though probably not quite all) - this film is really for the general public who doesn't quite know all of this, and also for those who might have heard something about global warming here and there but want to see exactly how all of the facts fit together. As I said, a very good educational film. The problems come in the short but noticeable periods when the film tries to be a biography of Al Gore at the same time. Now, I don't know about you, but I was watching this to find out about global warming, not to find out what Al Gore thought about losing the 2000 election. I imagine that these are the bits that teachers will fast-forward over when they show this to their classes, since they don't really add anything to the film. I would have respected Al Gore a bit more if he hadn't tried to make this a film also (in a way) about himself. I guess it's to be expected, since he's a politician, but it's disappointing. In closing, although it's not a perfect film, it's a pretty good one. It is THE film to watch if you want to find out about global warming (at least, I haven't heard of any better films out there). I don't really understand all of the "10" or "1" ratings on IMDb. It's not a "10" or "1" film. Even its biggest fans will have to admit that as a movie it could be a little tighter sometimes. I think it's good enough, but it's not perfect.

Featured Picks

और entertainment चाहिए? हमारे recommended gaming hub और short-drama destination को explore करें।

Instant Games

Gamixo

Puzzles, cards, sports और quick challenges वाले casual browser games कुछ ही सेकंड में खेलें।

Short Drama

VSKIT Drama

Trending mini-series, romance stories और नए short dramas को fast daily updates के साथ देखें।